The million-dollar question about intentionality isn’t just theoretical anymore. An AI-generated artwork sold for over a million dollars, making it a serious development in the art world. Artists who use generative AI tools have improved their creative output by 25%. Those working with AI-assisted tools produce almost twice as much creative work just months after they start using them.
The numbers look impressive, but people still debate what intentionality in art really means. The rise of machines that can imitate human creativity raises a key question: What makes true art different from something that’s just generated? Traditional intentionality philosophy focuses on human consciousness and purpose – qualities that critics say AI doesn’t have. But many famous quotes about intentionality remind us that art has always been about the connection between creator and audience, whatever tools they use.
This piece will get into what makes something “art” to begin with. We’ll look at AI as a creative partner instead of a replacement and talk about concerns over authenticity. The current skepticism about AI mirrors how people once rejected photography as “not real art.” Photography ended up expanding artistic possibilities rather than limiting them.
What makes something ‘art’ in the first place?
Philosophers have spent centuries wrestling with a basic question in esthetics: what exactly qualifies as “art”? The answer keeps changing based on culture and time. This question becomes even more relevant when we think about AI-generated creations and their purpose.
Traditional definitions of art
Art’s definition has evolved into three main categories: representation, expression, and form.
Plato gave us the first clear definition by seeing art as “mimesis” — copying or imitating reality. Artists who could create lifelike copies of their subjects earned the highest praise until the late eighteenth century. People valued Michelangelo’s and Rubens’ masterful portraits because of their true-to-life quality29.
The Romantic movement brought a new focus on expression. Artists wanted their work to stir emotions in viewers. The power to move people mattered more than technical skill29.
Immanuel Kant’s ideas helped shape formalism. This view suggests art doesn’t need a concept to be meaningful. The focus shifted to qualities like balance, rhythm, harmony, and unity. These elements became crucial as art moved toward abstraction in the 20th century29.
Intentionality philosophy and artistic intent
The heart of artistic creation lies in intentionality, though philosophers see its role differently. Livingston describes intentions as “a kind of propositional attitude, the content of which is a plan for doing something”30. Artists’ intentions can be conscious or unconscious and often develop as they create.
The intentionality debate has created two main philosophical groups: intentionalism and anti-intentionalism31.
Anti-intentionalists believe conventions alone determine a work’s meaning. The artist’s intention doesn’t matter to them. They see artworks as independent in their meaning31.
Actual intentionalists think we should focus on the creator’s intention. This view has three versions, from strict (meaning equals author’s intention) to flexible (conventions matter when intention isn’t clear)31.
Hypothetical intentionalism sits between these views. It suggests a work’s meaning comes from what an informed audience might think the author intended, based on available facts31.
Quotes about intentionality and meaning
Artists have shared deep insights about intention and meaning in their work:
“The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance.” — Aristotle4
“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.” — Edgar Degas5
“Art is not a handicraft, it is the transmission of feeling the artist has experienced.” — Leo Tolstoy4
“If I create from the heart, nearly everything works; if from the head, almost nothing.” — Marc Chagall4
These quotes show something important: art has always connected creators with their audience in meaningful ways, whatever the medium.
The creative process mixes preparation, incubation, inspiration, verification, and elaboration30. Virginia Woolf’s diaries show how artists bounce between spontaneous creation and planned ideas that don’t quite work30.
Art isn’t just about the tools used to create it. The real essence lies in the intention, meaning, and communication that happen during creation.
AI as a creative partner, not a replacement
Artists and artificial intelligence share a collaborative partnership rather than competing against each other. People’s fears about AI replacing human creativity have proven unfounded. AI serves as a powerful tool that expands artistic possibilities under human guidance.
Prompt engineering as modern brushwork
The art of crafting inputs for generative AI models has become a new artistic technique similar to traditional brushwork6. AI tools require artists to develop language-based communication skills unlike conventional tools that respond to physical manipulation. Artists and machines engage in an iterative dialog that creates a co-creative framework where intention flows through carefully constructed prompts6.
“Prompting is not just about creating art; it’s about exploring new frontiers of creativity,” notes one expert7. Artists need to understand AI’s capabilities and limitations to guide outputs toward their vision. Skilled prompt engineers blend technical knowledge with creative intuition, just as traditional artists become skilled at their chosen mediums.
The artist’s role in shaping AI outputs
Artists retain vital control over the creative process through several key mechanisms. Their vision and esthetic direction guide the process, something AI cannot generate independently. A researcher explains, “The human element in hybrid creativity remains essential to ensure that innovations are technically feasible, socially responsible, and arranged with human values”8.
Successful AI-human collaborations follow a clear pattern. Artists create original concepts, AI generates variations, humans pick promising directions, and the cycle continues with further refinement9. This approach utilizes AI’s computational power while preserving the artist’s intention and emotional depth10.
AI lacks the embodied understanding of cultural context and human experience needed for truly original creation8. One artist describes it as “a sort of collective unconscious”11. The system provides unexpected connections and possibilities that artists shape with purpose and meaning.
Examples of hybrid workflows
Creative professionals in various fields develop specialized workflows that combine AI capabilities with human direction:
Visual artists utilize AI to generate preliminary reference images as raw material for artistic interpretation10. Refik Anadol’s “Machine Hallucination” showcases this approach. The artist used AI to transform millions of images into a dreamlike projection that needed significant human curation7.
Director Barbara Khaliyesa Minishi combines AI tools with post-production work. This allows deeper exploration of narrative elements while maintaining artistic control. “From then on, I realized the value of AI tools for indie filmmakers,” she explains, while emphasizing her appreciation for traditional methods2.
Writers use AI’s analytical capabilities to overcome creative blocks and explore narrative possibilities. They filter suggestions through their unique voice and storytelling sensibilities12. Musicians generate novel melodies and harmonies with AI that become starting points for human composition12.
The fundamental nature of meaningful art relies on intentionality. AI serves to extend human creative vision rather than replace it.
The fear of soullessness: is AI art authentic?
The authenticity of AI-generated art sparks heated debates in creative circles. Traditional artists and critics question whether algorithms can produce “real art” without human experiences that shape artistic expression. The discussion delves deeper than technical abilities into art’s fundamental meaning.
Critics’ concerns about emotion and originality
The human element gives traditional artwork its value, and critics believe AI-generated art lacks this essential quality. Many experts describe AI outputs as “mere imitation, lacking in meaning and soul”13 or “flat or impersonal”14. Artists point out that AI “lacks the emotional depth and intentionality that comes from human creation”15.
Originality becomes another point of contention. Some experts note that “AI can mimic styles and techniques, but it cannot truly grasp the cultural significance behind them”14. The AI’s dependence on existing works raises questions about genuine innovation versus sophisticated copying—”it’s just a bland amalgamation of what has come before”16.
The myth of the ‘soul’ in art
The concept of artistic “soul” needs deeper examination. Art has long connected to what Jungian psychology calls “the mundus imaginalis”—a space “between waking and sleeping”1 where creativity thrives. This realm exists not in an artist’s conscious mind but in Jung’s unconscious, where “the gods left Olympus and reign now in the solar plexus of the individual”1.
Human creativity doesn’t just emerge from conscious intention. Many artists describe their process as connecting to something beyond themselves. One source explains, “When we create art, we’re not just expressing our conscious thoughts—we’re tapping into something deeper”17.
Emotional connection through curation
Research shows people form genuine emotional connections with AI-generated art, contrary to critics’ beliefs. A University of Vienna study found that “participants almost always experienced some emotion and perceived some level of intentionality” even knowing the artwork’s computer-generated origin18. Another study confirmed that “people ascribe intentions and emotions to both human- and AI-made art”19.
Human-created art still provokes “stronger emotions”18 and “marginally more favorable ratings in experiential aspects like beauty, interest, quality, pleasantness, meaningfulness, and clarity”19. The authenticity gap might be shrinking but remains noticeable.
Intentionality and emotional connection in art exist on a spectrum rather than as absolute qualities. The human role in curating, selecting, and contextualizing AI outputs becomes vital—similar to Panos Achlioptas’s suggestion that AI tools could provide “guidance and inspiration to ‘steer’ the artist’s work as desired”20.
Lessons from history: photography, digital art, and now AI
History repeats itself as new technologies challenge how we see art. Today’s concerns about AI-generated art mirror the fears that came with previous artistic breakthroughs.
Photography’s early rejection as art
The 1800s saw the birth of photography, and established painters panicked. “This is the end of art,” said Paul Delaroche after seeing his first photograph21. The poet Charles Baudelaire called photography art’s “most mortal enemy” and warned it would “supplant or corrupt it altogether”3. Critics brushed off photography as simple mechanical copying that needed no real skill.
Many portrait painters saw their jobs disappear quickly. Photography made image-making available to everyone, not just the wealthy22. The art world pushed back hard and claimed photographs couldn’t capture the moral messages and emotional depth of “real art.”
Time proved them wrong. Photography didn’t kill painting—it set it free. Painters no longer needed to capture reality perfectly. This freedom led to Impressionism and other modern art movements23. Photography grew into its own respected art form with unique qualities.
Digital art’s rise and acceptance
The same story played out decades later with digital technology. Computer art appeared in the 1960s, and artists like A. Michael Noll and Frieder Nake copied existing styles to gain respect3. The UK Musicians Union even tried to stop electronic drum machines and synthesizers because they threatened traditional musicians3.
People dismissed digital tools as cheap shortcuts. Artists showed what these tools could really do, and attitudes changed slowly. Digital art found its place as a real medium by the 1990s. Museums like MoMA and Tate Modern started adding digital works to their collections24.
Why AI is just the next step forward
The pattern stands out clearly. New technology first seems to threaten art before it opens new creative doors. “I cannot think of a single example of a new artistic tool or medium that ‘kills’ art by making ‘bad’ art,” one expert points out3.
AI differs not because it threatens art more than past innovations. It makes us think about what it means to create art. Like photography and digital art before it, the technology isn’t the art—people create meaning through how they use it.
Looking back teaches us something important. AI won’t replace human creativity. It will become another tool for artists to use, though we’ll need to rethink our ideas about technique and who creates art.
The future of intentionality in a world of automation
The frontier of AI-enhanced creativity raises questions about how intentionality will develop. Our creative landscape will change as generative AI advances, making us think about artistic purpose and meaning in the decades ahead.
Will human creativity adapt or fade?
People worry that AI might reduce human creativity, but this view misunderstands how technology and state-of-the-art art work together. “AI might help us to stop behaving like machines…and kick us into being creative again as humans,” argues Marcus du Sautoy, mathematician and author25. His point of view suggests AI could spark new ideas rather than replace humans – just like photography let painters explore abstraction.
Human creativity will likely grow alongside AI rather than disappear. People often talk about creativity as “some uniquely human magical process” even though we don’t fully understand our own creative mechanisms25. AI’s development might teach us more about the patterns in our creative process.
New skills for the AI-augmented artist
Artists need different skills in this AI-enhanced digital world. We learned that knowing machine learning processes matters most, along with becoming skilled at prompt engineering to communicate creative ideas to AI systems26.
Artists should also sharpen their curatorial judgment to select, relate, and shape AI-generated work into meaningful pieces. Barbara Khaliyesa Minishi, a Kenyan filmmaker, points out that AI tools offer great value to creative professionals but must work together with traditional artistic methods2.
Ethical and legal frameworks to come
The ethical and legal questions about AI art just need immediate answers. Copyright law faces unprecedented challenges because AI training uses millions of existing works without clear payment systems. The U.S. Copyright Office states that “if a work’s traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship”27.
SAG-AFTRA led the way with guidelines that ask for “explicit informed consent and fair compensation for the creation and use of any digital replicas”28. On top of that, the NO FAKES Act aims to stop unauthorized use of someone’s voice or likeness28.
These early frameworks should grow into detailed systems that balance new ideas with protecting human creativity. This creates room for AI-enhanced art while keeping human intention at the center.
Conclusion: The Evolving Canvas of Human-AI Creativity
Art has never been defined by its tools alone. The purpose and meaning behind its creation matter more. New artistic technologies faced resistance at first but ended up expanding creative possibilities. AI now writes the next chapter of this story.
Philosophical discussions about intentionality teach us something vital – art becomes meaningful when creators connect with their audience. This holds true no matter what medium they use. The human touch remains vital. Artists who guide AI with thoughtful prompts bring purpose and vision to the process. They turn mechanical generation into genuine artistic expression.
People once worried that photography and digital art lacked “soul.” We hear similar concerns about AI art today. But people form emotional bonds with AI-generated works, especially when human curation shapes the experience. This shows how art grows stronger with new technology rather than weaker.
Human creativity will adapt and thrive without doubt. Tomorrow’s successful artists will likely treat AI as a powerful partner. They’ll build new skills in prompt engineering and develop better judgment in curation. As these creative practices grow, ethical and legal frameworks will mature to protect human artistic contribution while supporting breakthroughs.
The core question “What makes AI creations true art?” leads us back to intentionality. True art springs from purpose, meaning, and the desire to share something important. This applies regardless of how it’s made. AI-generated works become art when human intention guides them and gives them meaning. They don’t replace human creativity – they amplify our artistic imagination.
FAQs
Q1. Can AI-generated creations be considered true art? AI-generated works can be considered art when guided by human intention and imbued with meaning. While the technology itself isn’t art, it becomes a powerful tool for artistic expression when directed by human creativity and purpose.
Q2. How does AI create art? AI art is created using generative AI technology that analyzes patterns in large datasets to produce new content. Artists use AI art generators and provide prompts or ideas, which the AI then interprets to create visual outputs. The process often involves collaboration between human creativity and machine capabilities.
Q3. What skills do artists need to work with AI? Artists working with AI need to develop new competencies such as understanding machine learning processes, mastering prompt engineering techniques, and refining their curatorial judgment. Balancing AI tools with traditional artistic practices is also crucial for creating meaningful AI-augmented art.
Q4. How does AI art compare to traditional art forms like photography? The emergence of AI art mirrors historical patterns seen with photography and digital art. Initially met with skepticism, these technologies eventually expanded artistic possibilities rather than replacing existing forms. Like its predecessors, AI is becoming another tool in artists’ arsenals, challenging and evolving our understanding of creativity.
Q5. What are the ethical and legal considerations surrounding AI art? AI art raises complex copyright and authorship issues. Current frameworks, like those established by the U.S. Copyright Office, don’t recognize machine-generated works as having human authorship. Ongoing efforts aim to develop comprehensive systems that balance innovation with protecting human creativity, addressing concerns about fair compensation and unauthorized use of existing works or likenesses.
References
[1] – https://www.creativitypost.com/article/myth_and_creativity_the_role_of_the_artist_and_the_sufi_tradition
[2] – https://www.salzburgglobal.org/news/topics/article/ai-art-and-creativity-exploring-the-artists-perspective
[3] – https://aaronhertzmann.com/2022/12/17/when-tech-changes-art.html
[4] – https://cravepainting.com/blog/quotes-about-art
[5] – https://sustainable-markets.org/post/life-quotes-inspired-by-art-living-with-intention
[6] – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10447318.2024.2431761
[7] – https://levelup.gitconnected.com/complete-guide-to-prompt-engineering-ab514d8a89f5
[8] – https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/how-ai-can-unlock-hybrid-creativity-in-the-workplace/
[9] – https://magai.co/generative-ai-has-transformed-creative-work/
[10] – https://itsartlaw.org/2024/04/16/artificial-intelligence-versus-human-artists-ai-as-a-creative-collaborator-in-art/
[11] – https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/08/is-art-generated-by-artificial-intelligence-real-art/
[12] – https://www.mklibrary.com/the-creative-collaboration-how-ai-tools-are-helping-artists-innovate/
[13] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9037325/
[14] – https://newbuffaloartgallery.com/post/11911-the-debate-on-ai-art-vs-human-made-fine-art-a-perspective
[15] – https://pixel-gallery.co.uk/blogs/pixelated-stories/controversial-ai-art-the-pieces-that-stirred-debate?srsltid=AfmBOopjcnSv5UXKBIfomvleII5E1BxmeB7IRlHCi-ajyq4kZYIwr7NY
[16] – https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/12/30/ai-generated-art-was-a-mistake-and-heres-why/
[17] – https://medium.com/mindful-mental-health/the-art-of-the-soul-where-psychology-meets-creativity-65e12cfc101a
[18] – https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/news/even-ai-generated-art-can-produce-emotions-in-viewers-377277
[19] – https://www.psypost.org/people-ascribe-intentions-and-emotions-to-both-human-and-ai-made-art-but-still-report-stronger-emotions-for-artworks-made-by-humans/
[20] – https://hai.stanford.edu/news/artists-intent-ai-recognizes-emotions-visual-art
[21] – https://blog.artsper.com/en/lifestyle/the-serious-relationship-of-art-and-technology/
[22] – https://www.artinsociety.com/pt-1-initial-impacts.html
[23] – https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/634439/EPRS_IDA(2019)634439_EN.pdf
[24] – https://romebusinessschool.com/blog/digital-art/
[25] – https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241018-ai-art-the-end-of-creativity-or-a-new-movement
[26] – https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/transformative-intersection-ai-creativity-art-music-innovation-dubov-bkbfc
[27] – https://www.law.com/therecorder/2023/06/30/legal-implications-of-use-of-ai-generated-art-in-intellectual-property/
[28] – https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/artificial-intelligence-must-serve-human-creativity-not-replace-it/
[29] – https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-the-definition-of-art-182707
[30] – https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/art-and-intention-a-philosophical-study/
[31] – https://iep.utm.edu/art-and-interpretation/